Seeker, I have received your reference to Vapors of Truth as labored. But I must be quick to call you to adherence of coherence on reference in pointing us away from indifference or ignorance as a positive state.
Seeker, how objective should illegal activities that exploit and misuse the youth if they were to escape an ill tag? The answer to that lies to the adherence of the law, coherent law making in eliminating lacunas and justiciable reference from courts where upon indifference or ignorance has been substantiated in disenfranchising the rights of women and youth. It will also follow that leadership speech with reach of the poor will always glorify its fendind for macroeconomics when literary feeding off microeconomics. The rich cannot preach to the poor about prosperity while legislating hardships of reaching posterity as may be the case. The perception of the rich may be to experience development timeously, of which no condemnation must be sought, were they not to leave anyone behind.
Families remain immersed in poverty of dignity while the economy makes strides of pride from the pandemic given the economist’s classes and the Socialist’s categories and hence the bottom-up economic model.Seeker, the duty of survival in which these beautiful souls are dimmed is a capitalist ideal but well ranked in privatization of factors for production, its evident the rights to ownership and control apply to a set predetermined from exclusion of similar attributes in other sets as our concern may discern
Seeker, The necessity of your knowledge is essential were you to acknowledge the grounds for the conclusion motivating opinion held by the Reverend of the Adventist faith seeking to address by adaptation and mitigation the result from poverty of dignity and hence essence of morality and ethos and ethics. It should be treated as incoherent inference were leadership to offer opinions of faith on poverty of dignity only for them to perform works of charity in reforming their ownership and control over factors of production through increment of poverties in labor
Where The Reverend of the Adventist faith prefers restoration upon privatization of state power in allowing capitalist democracy has yielded the opposite in exploitation and abuse of the less fortunate in society, the view held by the leadership takes the assumption from the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities in claiming economic growth but high cost of living. The individual is left to praise common power which affixes barely any empowerment contribution to their development. Seeker, it is agreed that the limited need not ask for permission in their mission of emancipation from poverty of dignity by imitating normal social order against the social contract, but, as the Reverend of the Adventist faith intercedes, from their ethos. But with a lack of national ethos the will need some luck which in most instance is drained and attained from tribes. While addressing the power of poverty; corruption, it is important to observe if to obey is to be easy in the busy bus bay with no passengers or a court where the Justiciary, Justiciar and Judge’s indifference is not due our lack of knowledge but our ignorance as a positive state to changing titles without changing entitlement.
But Seeker, life is a journey you say and love its path. The path of my life is that of love of knowledge and opinions at the same time which then informs me to make effort to build my opinions to the comfort of knowledge. Seeker, your knowledge on the comfort of survival being revival and if the less fortunate find this to be right, then their desire for comfort should inspire their efforts in survival in aspirations of revival is good and big for agenda and therefore an immediate premise to many. This has been the path for our women as limited and men as permitted and leadership as dictated. Particular paths always demand to be recovered when neglected and by so doing the people journeying on them towards the Universal Path of Love. Therefore limitation does not ask to be granted permission in imitation experiences and expressions if the objective and aim is to survive for revival in peace and unity towards the universal path of love in life.
Seeker, as guided, I sought to reconsider, as it ought to be, what I admit and submit as my insights into the arrow of time [consciousness] in relation to the conflict between expressions and experiences being a time-energy dispute. The beliefs of the Reverend of the Adventist faith regarding affections resulting in the afflictions of the women and girls point to faith with charity but are not in any way units of hope in the universal; love. You submit that the actions of the Reverend of the Adventist faith go beyond sympathy towards empathy as the empath in them steps forth. But this forward is towards the destiny of faith or the fate of hope? Are the mitigations and adaptations serving either, neither or both in preserving the plighted as highlighted and remedied through a series and sequence on sets of intervention that are devoid of condemnation with the knowledge of causation of such social effects sourced from lack of resources given the posterior and prior to resources? Should the consideration for affections inflicting afflictions as a result of the need but not want to gain without pain in the case of those Naivasha women to be reconsidered? or should your interrogations as furthered to mean that love is the destiny of life where permission’s limits does not subject one to the duty of survival but revival?
Seeker, nothing, so far, deters us to refer what we prefer in so far as relationships of affections, inflictions and afflictions may be. I reaffirm that love is made of the triad that is distributed with randomness of the order as attributed to fate or destiny in service of the eternal or the infinite as regards the immovable and unstoppable and on those grounds of the conclusion, I concur with it that the consciousness of the Adventist reverend should not be gathered separately from that of leadership in an harmoniously balanced society. Which you sum that it must not be the case that ordered chaos grant inflictions and afflictions in the name of affections in a democratic society for preservation of individual interests ought to allow for conservation of common interests. Seeker, to concur on disputed conflicts regarding the incidents from expressions and experiences of time and energy as incurred by those women and their families, since it is the accidents of the same that create the possibilities and probabilities in life as they may be preferred in Affections, Inflictions or Afflictions, is to appreciate that consciousness points to truths while disregarding falsities of permission without limiting the big for agenda to conserve the magnitude of its qualities as a universal and not a particular path of tribes before tribe and not tribe before tribes since in this is found the attributes of peace and unity that are necessary for the path of love in the journey of life.
Seeker, you aver that space will always give us the pleasure to unwind from the pressure of time in our different sets as we expand our ambition of posterity and prosperity. But what spatial configurations are we staring at? Where some are seeking space, others need a place. What is to be the location of either in the time-energy dispute? Should we keep staring upto the skies or should we in other moments look deep into the oceans?
Seeker, regarding the scattered aspects of one’s life and the prospects of gathering such a life together, address the busy business of happiness without gratification given its weight in our understanding of what is before us having held that happiness without gratification is consistent with impulsive joy purposely for timeous indulgence of the fruit; enjoyment. Having also submitted that the state of happiness is not an opinion of excitement but deliberate delight of the senses while being mindful of the needful, also take note of your further submission that the diversity of this deliberate delight enlightens on the inclusivity or exclusivity of happiness in addressing that regarding, exclusive happiness, and in finding it that exclusive and inclusive happiness cannot exist in one subject. I must submit that this ought to be thorough given that life is a journey and love it path. What is the place of happiness in the path of this journey? What is the opinion of happiness and how different is it from its knowledge?
I appreciate exclusive happiness, but, essentially and necessary so, fail to acknowledge the extensiveness of its incoherence given the positive state of my ignorance brought about by my opinions as scattered aspects with respect to a meaningful life and not lack of knowledge. So should an incoherent life as may be observed from one’s attributes bare its qualities? To what extent should reference be made from poverty of dignities?
The account on the Reverend of the Adventist Faith and the Naivasha Women clearly goes to demonstrate one cannot buy happiness but excitement given the former’s tendency to charity and faith in charity. Contrary, and on the other hand, what makes one sad or happy can be and is money; currency to expression or experience! But in this money serves not as the source of happiness but a resource to freedom from poverty of dignity in human activities. While a Happy Hobby can fulfill contentment extents, happiness is not a hobby as put forth. Having considered that Happiness is inward and Excitement is outward, Seeker, where will the supposition of happiness being the quality of freedom from poverty of dignity in the path of love in life as a journey?
Seeker, the love for life is found in happiness being the quality of freedom from poverty of dignity? If Poverty and dignity influence Incoherent lifestyles where the nexus between money, regarding expectations of current experiences or expressions, poverty concerning various manifestations and dignity in discerning lack of poverty, the only emotional unit to point us towards one being coherent with needs as is with Dignity’s Satisfaction is happiness?
Out of care, Seeker, you chose to share on the Conflict within and the Conflict without by submitting that the former requires with urgency the latter a plan on poverty Eradication through Work, Money plan regarding what coherently can be sold and bought or both and Plan for dignity for us to compare. A plan for dignity requires Identity to manifest despite the limitations. Now, if we are to Identify with happiness caused by delight , the plan seems to start where one can afford; Affordable here being sustainable for one Always to be in control of their happiness and hence letting not limitation ask for permission when surviving the journey of life in revival of love.
Given that Outdoor life comes at a cost else one is lost, the point of more moments is unit memories that one can attribute inclusive happiness’s qualities to. Presence is outward but participation inward, for the former is a particular that one can observe the latter from, that being its universal. When presence anticipates to participate then we don’t end up with empty memories to catch or watch on camera given they are too big for agenda which ought to have been a memory of disciplined determination when one’s dispensation turns into an exercise of compensation that is rational but not reasonable in adherence to coherence as a reference from indifference and ignorance.
